Suchergebnisse

In this article the authors concentrate upon the key questions, in the first place, upon the movement from object to subject and from the dichotomy "the state - the market" to the integral economic system. For the purposes of this research it has been important to comprehend economy within a context of long waves of conjuncture and a quantum nature of the market as integrity. In conclusion an attempt of comparative estimation of the present and synergetic approaches to strategy has been undertaken.

Intensifying crisis of the world economy, including the Russian one, warns against using stereotypes that have not brought by now to constructive results. The paper grounds the necessity of cardinal theoretical revising the ongoing economic processes. The authors pay attention to four main items of the current economic situation that are to be solved immediately. The country must, first, consider the economy as a part of common cultural landscape. Second, it ought to use the chance for reorientation of the economy from external markets alone to creating large internal market niches. Third, it should implement the transition to quant economic growth with a notion of potential as a leading one; in the course of analyzing this problem the portion concept of electronic arc developed by academician G. Mesyats has been used. Fourth, the complication of market and changing parameters of economic space getting much more many-tier ought to be taken into account by policymakers.

Financial capital is considered as a precondition of forming an integral market system. Based on financial capital a vertical market model is taking shape. It includes the following leading markets: strategic markets of financial capital, finance and money markets, markets of physical (cluster) capital, markets of social (consumers) capital. Markets of financial capital build the world reproduction model of synergetic character. Sustainability of the world market is maintained within the framework of the following types of big financial capital systems: cooperation of industrial and banking capital (Hilferding), international banks (Keynes), state monopoly of GDP (well known as far back, as in the USSR period). One can consider this framework as a political form of general equilibrium of the global market. A systemic function of financial capital is gathering power for ensuring endogenous evolution of economy and society on the principles of market self-organization. The authors believe this is the only way out of a deadlock for our economy and society.

The paper takes notice of an ever growing inadequacy of the aims and outcomes of catch-up development. Contrary to the widespread approach to catch-up policy as following up the path passed by the developed countries, the authors consider catch-up development as an immanent feature of the global rather than domestic market. Arguing this standpoint they analyze some modern catch-up theories and other corresponding issues including synergetic model of growth. The latter assumes that all economic actors, from the state and to an individual, act as creative partners and competitors on the national and global levels. Thus they obtain the equal prospects for success.

The paper connects the current global economic crisis with ending the Long Kondratieff Wave and entering a new one. Neoliberal recipes have been already out of date for such transformation as well as for further functioning of the economy. According to the authors, neither the monetarist nor the Keynesian approaches can substitute them. The only alternative is the synergetic model of development, first of all building the market hierarchy instead of the traditional linear system of governance. The urgent necessity of comprehending strategical interaction between the synergetic transformation and the systemic integrity of economy is stressed upon in the article. All through the paper the crises in the USA and Russia are compared. In particular, it is suggested the crisis in our country might be deeper if one takes into account the difference between the depth of economic and social bottoms in both countries.

The article attempts theoretical rethinking of the inflation phenomenon. The economists have got accustomed to discuss "monetary vs. non-monetary nature of inflation", though such an approach poorly corresponds with present-day realities. Therefore the authors use the methodology of economic synergetics in their study of inflation. They reveal complicated correlations between such functions of money as a cost equivalent, a form of cost, and a reproduction model. The analysis leads to a model of an inflationary market mechanism that allows to compensate the growing capital intensity of national income by a market expansion and thus to maintain a financial stability in the economy.

The authors present some comments on the article "Groups and Their Interests" by A. Rubinstein (Voprosy Economiki. 2006. No 11). The article is highly estimated by the authors. Meanwhile, they believe the problem put forward cannot be solved without a new approach to macroeconomics as a multi-leveled system with the leading role of financial capital. In order to discuss macroeconomic issues in the context of the complex systems theory the authors develop a synergetic paradigm.

The authors believe the roots of the main risks of the Russian economy lie in the macro-level economy; the latter does not mean an aggregated market. Within the framework of the synergetic paradigm, it is an independent phenomenon based on financial capital. The article analyzes in detail the risks in both primary and mature macroeconomic markets, as well as the most essential contradictions, which take place in the process of their forming. The authors warn against the reiteration of the traditional path to macroeconomic market.

"The Third Way" concept is still widespread all over the world. Growing socio-economic uncertainty makes the authors revise the concept. In the course of discussion with other authors they introduce a synergetic vision of the problem. That means in the first place changing a linear approach to the economic research for a non-linear one.

Making its socioeconomic structure more complex is among the most important tasks on the agenda in Russia. This is a necessary prerequisite of creating a modern market economy. A tandem of big financial capital acting reciprocally with the state, and regional markets is the foundation of such an economy. The more definite in this respect Russia's self-identification will be the sooner it will become the center of attraction for other CIS countries. In order to response adequately to the challenges of globalization the CIS countries have to ensure that radical domestic reforms be accompanied with the speed-up mutual integration of their economies.

The article deals with the problems of transition from the neo-liberal to the synergetic type of globalization. Against a background of this process, the most essential changes of the status of regions and municipalities in our country are considered. The authors conclude that Russia on the whole is necessarily to become one of the New Regionalisms.